Kentucky Domain Name Verdict Delayed

January 27, 2010 | News Category: Gaming Law

0 Comments

It was thought that the Kentucky Supreme Court would be handing down the decision in the Kentucky domain name court case last week, however no decision was forthcoming.

In October of 2009, the parties involved in the Kentucky domain name case were asked to make oral arguments with regard to their different positions, in front of the State of Kentucky Supreme Court. The six Supreme Court judges heard the arguments, but it was not known exactly when a decision would be handed down from the court.

Governor Steve Beshear outsourced lawyers, who are representing the state of Kentucky, worked hard to try and get a better verdict that would support their position in the case. The case was in fact, like an appeal against an appeal.

In the lower courts, it was ruled that the state of Kentucky had lacked the jurisdiction necessary to seize the 141 Internet gambling domain names that were both registered and domiciled outside of the state itself. The state of Kentucky had attempted to seize the domain names, since they considered them gambling devices, which can legally be seized in Kentucky. Those who oppose the domain name seizure feel that Internet domain names cannot be considered gambling devices. This has been upheld by the lower courts.

Although the rumor mill suggested that a decision would be forthcoming soon, apparently, it is not yet ready to be revealed to the interested parties. iMEGA, along with a number of other organizations, such as the IGC, had expected that a decision would be handed down this past week. It now seems that a decision may not be revealed until late March of this year, still a couple of months away.

The chairman of iMEGA, Joe Brennan Junior, said in a statement, "Everyone was surprised in Kentucky. The rumor mill thought the decision was going to be rendered. That could have been why their (Kentucky) attorneys acted so quickly at the end of December (when the state sought to add new information to its bried), so if they got an adverse decision, they could keep it alive."

Mr. Brennan noted that at this time the nearest possible date available for the busy Supreme Court to hand down the decision would be on March 18th. There are no dates that have been listed for the month of February. Should the decision not be ready by the March date, the options after that date fall out on April 22nd, May 20th, or June 17th.

With the many changes that are likely to take place in the online gambling world, many are waiting to hear what the Supreme Court will rule.

Add a Comment
Name: *

Email: (won't be published) *

Website URL:

Verify the image below: *



Gaming Law Headlines

Newfoundland Against Online Casino Legalization
September 01, 2010

Although other Canadian provinces are legalizing online gambling, Newfoundland does not wish to have any part in it...Full story

McDermott Pushing for Markup of Online Gambling Tax Bill
August 30, 2010

Jim McDermott is working hard to try and get the House Ways and Means Committee to deal with HR 4976 before the end of this session of Congress...Full story

Online Gambling Decisions in Holland
August 29, 2010

The report which the Dutch Ministry of Justice requested last year regarding legalizing online gambling in Holland, has been completed...Full story

South African Province Warns Online Gambling Illegal
August 25, 2010

The South African province of Gauteng has declared online gambling illegal, and plans to prosecute those that continue to gamble online, or offer these services...Full story

Israeli ISPs Comply for Now
August 21, 2010

Israeli ISPs have begun to follow the directive they were issued, in which they were instructed to block a number of online gambling websites...Full story

News Categories