Christie Vetoes Online Gambling Bill

March 04, 2011 | News Category: Gaming Law

0 Comments

New Jersey and the online gambling community in the United States have been waiting for Governor Chris Christie to either veto or sign the New Jersey intrastate online gambling bill. The verdict is in, and Governor Christie vetoed the bill.

At first, it seemed as if the veto would be a conditional veto, but within hours, it became clear that the veto was an absolute veto. A conditional veto would have meant that the bill could have returned to the State Assembly, been amended, and then returned to the governor. However, this was not the case, and Christie made it clear to the Legislature why he did not accept the online gambling bill.

To begin with, Christie explained why he felt the online gambling bill does not follow the State Constitution. He noted: "The State Constitution explicitly requires casino gambling to be restricted to the territorial limits of Atlantic City. Senate Bill No. 490 seeks to avoid this requirement by deeming all Internet wagers as being placed in Atlantic City, even if the person placing the bet is outside the boundaries of the city. In my view, the creation of a legal fiction deeming all wagers to have 'originated' in Atlantic City cannot overcome the clear and unambiguous language of the State Constitution."

Senator Raymond Lesniak, the sponsor of the New Jersey online gambling bill, had already said earlier this year that if the governor chose to veto the online gambling bill, that he would not try to override the decision.

Joe Brennan, the chairman of iMEGA, the Interactive Media & Gaming Association, said: "At the beginning of the day, Senator Lesniak thought he had an understanding on what changes (the governor) wanted to see if there was a conditional veto."

Later in the day, Brennan noted that the veto was definitely a full veto. It is likely that the bill will now go to a referendum, and it is also likely that a referendum will pass the online gambling bill into law. Brennan said: "We used the governor's own pollster and found that 63 percent would vote for (online gaming)."

Brennan wondered if perhaps the reason the governor vetoed the bill is because of the large land based casino company that lobbied against it. Brennan said: "Maybe it was their lobbying (that killed it). Who knows? Regardless of what the governor did today, people are going to bet on the Internet. They're just not going to do it on a site licensed by the state of New Jersey. I'm not saying I encourage it, but that's the reality."

Add a Comment
Name: *

Email: (won't be published) *

Website URL:

Verify the image below: *



Gaming Law Headlines

Online Gambling Moves Forward in New Jersey
May 13, 2012

Online gambling legislation in New Jersey seems to be moving forward at a fast pace, with many lawmakers pushing to legalize gambling as soon as possible...Full story

US Online Gambling in the News Again
April 19, 2012

There has been more movement in the United States regarding the legalization and regulation of online gambling...Full story

Online Gambling Legislation in New Jersey
April 11, 2012

The New Jersey Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee voted in favor of recent online gambling legislation...Full story

Kentucky Orders Online Gambling Domain Names Forfeited
March 31, 2012

Judge Wingate has ordered that the online gambling domain names be forfeited in the case brought against them by the Commonwealth of Kentucky...Full story

Possible Harmonized Rules for EU Online Gambling
February 26, 2012

The European Commission is working hard toward harmonizing the online gambling laws for all European member states...Full story

News Categories

Top Online Casino